Your topics....

Time again for you to choose the topics.....

In All Fairness.....

In all fairness, Interim Daddona deserves all the credit for going after the IT Director. The alleged misconduct was started under Marks' reign. Daddona wanted accountability and went after him. At that point, the Director was put on leave with pay, as required, until the lawyers decided how to proceed. Remember, innocent until proven guilty? That's why there is a leave with pay. Once this is a legal issue, the lawyers dictate what is done. There are people accusing Daddona of the outcome. He has NO choice on what is done with the Director or what is required of him. Be fair! Daddona is giving you accountability and he is criticized for doing it? Doesn't make sense.

Executive Session, miscellaneous

(1) I heard Sue Haynie left the Board of Ed meeting and did not attend the executive session. (2)RedApples are populating the parent sessions to make their agenda heard. (3) NORWALKACT has a private session with the search firm???

As the snow falls.....

You get your choice of topics! What's on your mind?

Not a Fair Chance

It was heard at a PTO Council meeting that Mike B., Board member, stated if Tony Daddona applies for the superindendent's position, Daddona would not get his (Mike's) vote. Law suit? Hostile environment? Not a fair chance? What is your opinion? At the very least, it's an irresponsible comment, in my opinion.

Civility Code?

There are no signatures on the BOE Civility Code. Are you wondering who is objecting?

Superintendent Search

Do we want a vision that has been created for a district that is not Norwalk? Are we willing to accept a retiree from another state again? Do we want a rookie again? What do we want in our new superintendent other than a great interview? Think about it. We've been accepting a lot of promises and 'words' that don't fit the state's requirements or Norwalk's. We need to realistically face where we are and who can move us forward.